Skip to main content

Creating Modern Math/Science Knowledge: Panel

By
During the discussion, the following comments were made:

  • Big Picture Schools and SLA are examples of schools using Project Based Learning and Inquiry effectively.
  • Foundation and Support are the key
  • Right now the battle is between Project Based vs. Standards Based-My comment: Shouldn't projects be based on the standards?
  • Stager: "NCLB was created by man, it can be undone by man!"
  • Participant: "NCLB is not a bad thing, the execution is bad." "Most who bash it haven't read it" "9% of child's time from 0-18 is spent in a classroom"
  • Charischak: "NCTM doesn't have computers at their conference anymore."
  • David Thornburg mentioned this software developed by NASA for math.
  • Thornburg: "I did read all of NCLB and found some good chuckles." ,"Within a year, more than half of AP test takers must be above average", Unfunded mandates: Technology, "What got funded was the cheap stuff: Measure, measure, measure." "Tools of assessment are driving what gets taught."
  • Last piece of positive advice: As kids/teachers got tired and needed a "mental health break" -"Gopher Cam" kids set up a camera to watch a gopher, "Before I looked at it as a hole, now I want to go see what's there..." Kids develop the confidence, curiosity and skill set to find out.

More notes on the whole day can be found on this Google Doc created by Dan Sutherland, director of S.T.E.M. curriculum for Sparta Township Public Schools in Sparta, NJ, a new member of my PLN!

Labels:

Comments

Mike Dronen said…
We are going through "curriculum adoption" now with the underlying assumption that we will land upon a single best solution - hmmm. For whatever reason it just seems that the math folks approach the curriculum search as such a linear task with an absolute and discreet solution. Come on! Da'Vinci, we need you!
January 22, 2009 at 7:57 PM
Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

We Have Met the Enemy and He is PowerPoint! A Reflection

By
Today, the New York Times ran an interesting article regarding the use of PowerPoint in the military, We Have Met the Enemy and He is PowerPoint . It was a fairly damning critique of an organization that gets most of its information or lack of information through PowerPoint slides. Here are a few quotes from the article: “PowerPoint makes us stupid" - Gen. James N. Matti “It’s dangerous because it can create the illusion of understanding and the illusion of control...Some problems in the world are not bullet-izable.” -Gen. H.R. McMaster And the following comment that I think has a great impact for us as educators: " Commanders say that behind all the PowerPoint jokes are serious concerns that the program stifles discussion, critical thinking and thoughtful decision-making ." And this... "Commanders say that the slides impart less information than a five-page paper can hold, and that they relieve the briefer of the need to polish writing to convey an analytic, persu...
9 comments
Read more

Syncronicity Regarding the Future of Learning: Are you a Sherpa or a Jazz Musician?

By
Yesterday, Sara Swenson , Edina High School Librarian (She prefers that term!) shared the following video with me via e-mail that she found on an NCTE Web s ite . I thought that the video crystallized for me the potential for educational technology integration, 21st Century learning and learning beyond the classroom walls. It is something we are working on with our Community of Practice . That isn't to say that there won't be road blocks to navigate, or crevasses to traverse! We know they exist now! I was intrigued to see the teacher's role defined in such creative ways!! When people ask you what you do for a living, do you respond as "teacher", "educator", "instructor", facilitator", or are you a "Connected Learning Incubator" or are you still "Keeper of All Knowledge Which Is Good?" Hmmm ... Then this morning, I checked my Twitter feed and Will Richardson had posted about a conference on the Future of Education ...
8 comments
Read more